Hacker News with Generative AI: Peer Review

To what extent is science a strong-link problem? (svpow.com)
Here’s a fascinating and worrying news story in Science: a top US researcher apparently falsified a lot of images (at least) in papers that helped get experimental drugs on the market — papers that were published in top journals for years, and whose problems have only recently become apparent because of amateur sleuthing through PubPeer.
The early days of peer review: five insights from historic reports (nature.com)
The UK Royal Society has more experience of peer review than most publishers, with the practice used by its journals for nearly 200 years.
Peer review by committee? New journal rethinks old model (nature.com)
The Stacks Journal is aiming to provide a faster, more transparent and trustworthy peer-review model by organizing committees of researchers to assess manuscripts.
Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review (plos.org)
Citations play an important role in researchers’ careers as a key factor in evaluation of scientific impact. Many anecdotes advice authors to exploit this fact and cite prospective reviewers to try obtaining a more positive evaluation for their submission.
Peer review is essential for science. Unfortunately, it's broken (arstechnica.com)