Supreme Court Backs Law Requiring TikTok to Be Sold or Banned
(nytimes.com)
The Supreme Court ruled against TikTok on Friday, rejecting the social media company’s First Amendment challenge to the law that effectively bans it in the United States starting on Sunday.
The Supreme Court ruled against TikTok on Friday, rejecting the social media company’s First Amendment challenge to the law that effectively bans it in the United States starting on Sunday.
Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban
(techcrunch.com)
The Supreme Court has upheld the law that will effectively ban TikTok on Sunday, January 19.
The Supreme Court has upheld the law that will effectively ban TikTok on Sunday, January 19.
Supreme Court wrestles with explosion of online porn
(thehill.com)
The Supreme Court weighed whether an explosion in online pornography requires repudiating the court’s precedents concerning sexual content as the justices Wednesday heard arguments in a challenge to Texas’s age-verification law for porn websites.
The Supreme Court weighed whether an explosion in online pornography requires repudiating the court’s precedents concerning sexual content as the justices Wednesday heard arguments in a challenge to Texas’s age-verification law for porn websites.
Banning TikTok Is Unconstitutional. The Supreme Court Must Step In
(aclu.org)
Last week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in one of the most important First Amendment cases of our time: TikTok v. Garland. Brought by TikTok and its users, the suit challenges a law passed last Congress that will functionally ban the platform in the U.S.starting January 19. If upheld, the law won’t just impact the more than 170 million Americans who use TikTok, it will also endanger the constitutional rights of every American to speak and receive information online.
Last week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in one of the most important First Amendment cases of our time: TikTok v. Garland. Brought by TikTok and its users, the suit challenges a law passed last Congress that will functionally ban the platform in the U.S.starting January 19. If upheld, the law won’t just impact the more than 170 million Americans who use TikTok, it will also endanger the constitutional rights of every American to speak and receive information online.
The Supreme Court doesn't seem likely to save TikTok
(vox.com)
If you’re a professional TikTok creator, it’s probably time to get a new job.
If you’re a professional TikTok creator, it’s probably time to get a new job.
TikTok plans to shut down US site unless Supreme Court strikes law forcing sale
(cbsnews.com)
TikTok says it plans to shut down the social media site in the U.S. by Jan. 19 unless the Supreme Court strikes down or otherwise delays the effective date of a law aimed at forcing TikTok's sale by its Chinese parent company.
TikTok says it plans to shut down the social media site in the U.S. by Jan. 19 unless the Supreme Court strikes down or otherwise delays the effective date of a law aimed at forcing TikTok's sale by its Chinese parent company.
Trump asks Supreme Court to intervene in hush money sentencing
(amylhowe.com)
President-elect Donald Trump came to the Supreme Court on Wednesday morning, asking the justices to halt the criminal sentencing scheduled for Friday morning in his New York hush money case.
President-elect Donald Trump came to the Supreme Court on Wednesday morning, asking the justices to halt the criminal sentencing scheduled for Friday morning in his New York hush money case.
TikTok should lose its big Supreme Court case
(vox.com)
The Supreme Court case asking if the government can ban TikTok is easier than it looks.
The Supreme Court case asking if the government can ban TikTok is easier than it looks.
The huge stakes for free speech in a new Supreme Court case about porn
(vox.com)
Texas asks the justices to abandon longstanding First Amendment protections for sexual speech.
Texas asks the justices to abandon longstanding First Amendment protections for sexual speech.
Review by Senate Democrats finds more unreported luxury trips by Clarence Thomas
(npr.org)
A nearly two-year investigation by Democratic senators of Supreme Court ethics details more luxury travel by Justice Clarence Thomas and urges Congress to establish a way to enforce a new code of conduct.
A nearly two-year investigation by Democratic senators of Supreme Court ethics details more luxury travel by Justice Clarence Thomas and urges Congress to establish a way to enforce a new code of conduct.
Solicitor General Redacted the Word "Plenary" from a SCOTUS Brief with Marker
(reason.com)
Attorney General Meese is a living legend. At the age of 92, he has made more contributions to the law than just about any American who did not serve on the Supreme Court.
Attorney General Meese is a living legend. At the age of 92, he has made more contributions to the law than just about any American who did not serve on the Supreme Court.
Big loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won't hear challenge to $15 broadband law
(arstechnica.com)
The Supreme Court yesterday rejected the broadband industry's challenge to a New York law that requires Internet providers to offer $15- or $20-per-month service to people with low incomes.
The Supreme Court yesterday rejected the broadband industry's challenge to a New York law that requires Internet providers to offer $15- or $20-per-month service to people with low incomes.
Supreme Court wants US input on whether ISPs should be liable for users' piracy
(arstechnica.com)
The Supreme Court signaled it may take up a case that could determine whether Internet service providers must terminate users who are accused of copyright infringement.
The Supreme Court signaled it may take up a case that could determine whether Internet service providers must terminate users who are accused of copyright infringement.
Supreme Court wants US input on whether ISPs should be liable for users' piracy
(arstechnica.com)
The Supreme Court signaled it may take up a case that could determine whether Internet service providers must terminate users who are accused of copyright infringement.
The Supreme Court signaled it may take up a case that could determine whether Internet service providers must terminate users who are accused of copyright infringement.
Supreme Court to review 5th Circuit ruling that upends Universal Service Fund
(arstechnica.com)
The US Supreme Court will hear appeals of a 5th Circuit ruling that called Universal Service fees on phone bills an illegal tax.
The US Supreme Court will hear appeals of a 5th Circuit ruling that called Universal Service fees on phone bills an illegal tax.
Court rejects bid for compensation after police raid damaged Texas woman's house
(amylhowe.com)
The Supreme Court declined on Monday morning to hear the case of a Texas woman seeking compensation for damage to her home inflicted by a SWAT team pursuing a fugitive.
The Supreme Court declined on Monday morning to hear the case of a Texas woman seeking compensation for damage to her home inflicted by a SWAT team pursuing a fugitive.
Clarence Thomas Thinks the Real Victims Are Prosecutors Who Engage in Misconduct
(slate.com)
The Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in Glossip v. Oklahoma, a death penalty case posing a question so bizarre that its very existence should serve as an indictment for capital punishment: Can courts force a state to execute a possibly innocent prisoner when the state itself doesn’t want to?
The Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in Glossip v. Oklahoma, a death penalty case posing a question so bizarre that its very existence should serve as an indictment for capital punishment: Can courts force a state to execute a possibly innocent prisoner when the state itself doesn’t want to?
Supreme Court takes nuclear waste case too wild to believe
(slate.com)
The Supreme Court took up a spate of new cases last week as the justices regrouped for a new term. Although the court is obviously trying to duck controversial disputes before Election Day, it took up some strange and important appeals—including a case that poses the curious question: What if a federal court—in this case, yet again, the hyper-reactionary U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit—declared that the nation’s entire system of nuclear waste storage is actually illegal?
The Supreme Court took up a spate of new cases last week as the justices regrouped for a new term. Although the court is obviously trying to duck controversial disputes before Election Day, it took up some strange and important appeals—including a case that poses the curious question: What if a federal court—in this case, yet again, the hyper-reactionary U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit—declared that the nation’s entire system of nuclear waste storage is actually illegal?
Twitter decides to comply with Brazilian Supreme Court order, will return
(cnnbrasil.com.br)
Advogados, que estão à frente da defesa do X no Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), relataram à CNN, na manhã desta quinta-feira (19), que o corpo jurídico do empresário Elon Musk nos Estados Unidos foi convencido de que, para voltar a atuar no Brasil, seria necessário cumprir as decisões do ministro Alexandre de Moraes.
Advogados, que estão à frente da defesa do X no Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), relataram à CNN, na manhã desta quinta-feira (19), que o corpo jurídico do empresário Elon Musk nos Estados Unidos foi convencido de que, para voltar a atuar no Brasil, seria necessário cumprir as decisões do ministro Alexandre de Moraes.
Affirmative Action Was Banned. What Happened Next Was Confusing
(nytimes.com)
When the Supreme Court ruled against race-conscious admissions, the expectation — based on statistical modeling presented in court — was that the proportion of Black students at highly selective schools would go down and the proportion of Asian American students would rise.
When the Supreme Court ruled against race-conscious admissions, the expectation — based on statistical modeling presented in court — was that the proportion of Black students at highly selective schools would go down and the proportion of Asian American students would rise.