When Open Source Isn't: How OpenRewrite Lost Its Way(medium.com) On December 26th 2024, I opened GitHub and discovered that openrewrite/rewrite-java-security — a repository I had spent the better part of two years building recipes for — had been moved, made closed source, relicensed, and made proprietary by Moderne, Inc.
When Open Source Isn't: How OpenRewrite Lost Its Way(medium.com) On December 26th 2024, I opened GitHub and discovered that openrewrite/rewrite-java-security — a repository I had spent the better part of two years building recipes for — had been moved, made closed source, relicensed, and made proprietary by Moderne, Inc.
ARMv9 Architecture Helps Lift Arm to New Financial Heights(nextplatform.com) The Armv9 architecture has a lot of technical enhancements to commend it, but as far as Arm Holdings, the creator and licensor of the Arm architecture, is concerned one of the best features of Armv9, which was first unveiled four years ago, is that it comes with a higher royalty fee than prior Armv7 and Armv8 architectures.
Redis is open source again(antirez.com) Five months ago, I rejoined Redis and quickly started to talk with my colleagues about a possible switch to the AGPL license, only to discover that there was already an ongoing discussion, a very old one, too.
Wikipedia: Database Download(wikipedia.org) Wikipedia offers free copies of all available content to interested users. These databases can be used for mirroring, personal use, informal backups, offline use or database queries (such as for Wikipedia:Maintenance). All text content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC-BY-SA), and most is additionally licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). [1] Images and other files are available under different terms, as detailed on their description pages.
You shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library(gnu.org) The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. One is the GNU Lesser GPL; the other is the ordinary GNU GPL. The choice of license makes a big difference: using the Lesser GPL permits use of the library in proprietary programs; using the ordinary GPL for a library makes it available only for free programs.
Breaking the Llama Community License(victor.earth) If you're distributing or redistributing a LLM model that is under the "Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement", you might be breaking at least one of the terms you've explicitly/implicitly agreed to.All of the Llama models and their derivatives (fine-tunes etc) of them is are covered by a Llama Community License.
122 points by ssddanbrown 49 days ago | 50 comments
Microsoft Urges Businesses to Abandon Office Perpetual Licenses(microsoft.com) As a leader of a small or medium-sized business, you may have invested in Microsoft Office years ago through a perpetual license or “on-premises” version to equip your team with essential productivity apps like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.
GPLv2 is not impressed by Git(thomas-huehn.com) There is this strange little clause in the GNU General Public License, version 2 – but not version 3 – that pretty much everybody ignores. When distributing a modified program in source form,
12 points by josephcsible 80 days ago | 2 comments
Not Lonely at All (2009)(ma.tt) Daniel Jalkut of Red Sweater Software wrote a blog post called Getting Pretty Lonely and and says, among other things, “Whenever I am reminded that WordPress is GPL, my passion for it takes a bit of a dive. I’m more comfortable with the true freedom of liberally-licensed products.” More importantly, he says that “GPL stifles participation,” and implies the same for adoption.
Author changes popular VSCode Material Theme license, threatens to sue(visualstudio.com) So, uh, the guy who made the VS Code Material Theme is threatening everyone who uses it in their products. He seems to have forgotten it was originally licensed under the Apache License, 2.0.. He wiped the commit history to make it look like it was always his weird fake license.