Hacker News with Generative AI: Software Licenses

I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022) (mendhak.com)
Dealing with open source software, I regularly encounter many kinds of licenses — MIT, Apache, BSD, GPL being the most prominent — and I’ve taken time out to read them. Of the many, the GNU General Public License (GPL) stands out the most. It reads like a letter to the reader rather than legalese, and feels quite in tune with the spirit of open source and software freedom.
An appeals court may kill a GNU GPL software license (theregister.com)
An appeals court may kill a GNU GPL software license
The Future of GPLv3 Hangs in the Balance (sfconservancy.org)
SFC filed an amicus brief in the ongoing case of Neo4j, Inc. v. PureThink, LLC, which is now appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Source-available is meaningless (keygen.sh)
We've seen it play out a hundred times: a VC-backed company launches a new "open source" project, and perhaps right away, or maybe later on, they license their project under what's known as a "source-available" license. Yet they still call it "open source" — a phenomenon known as "open washing."
Please stop inventing new software licences (2020) (shkspr.mobi)
A few weeks ago, I received an unsolicited email inviting me to try out an exciting new " _quantum resistant_