Hacker News with Generative AI: Code Review

Move faster, wait less: Improving code review time at Meta (engineering.fb.com)
When done well, code reviews can catch bugs, teach best practices, and ensure high code quality. At Meta we call an individual set of changes made to the codebase a “diff.” While we like to move fast at Meta, every diff must be reviewed, without exception. But, as the Code Review team, we also understand that when reviews take longer, people get less done.
Why AI will never replace human code review (graphite.dev)
It needs to be said: AI can’t fully replace human code review.
The AI Code Review Disconnect: Why Your Tools Aren't Solving Your Real Problem (avikalpg.github.io)
Many engineering teams are purchasing AI code review tools, but are they solving the problem they think they are?
Gemini Code Assist for GitHub Pull Requests (github.com/marketplace)
Accelerate code reviews and improve code quality
Excellent Pull Request Reviews (michaelheap.com)
Pull request reviews are a critical part of building high-quality products, but too often, they become a rubber-stamping exercise—skim, “LGTM,” approve. This kind of review can lead to broken code, unclear documentation, and missed opportunities for improvement.
Show HN: Generate instant docs, tutorials and code reviews for any GitHub repo (entelligence.ai)
Show HN: Haystack Code Reviewer – Perform code reviews on a canvas (haystackeditor.com)
Haystack Code Reviewer breaks down a pull request into manageable chunks and visualizes related changes on an interactive canvas
Ask HN: What is a common PR review time at your company? (ycombinator.com)
I find myself frequently frustrated by waiting for PR reviews. There is tons of writing on the internet about short review times being better for productivity, and lots of tips-n-tricks for how to reduce PR review time.
Stacked Diffs Can Be Expensive: Why You Should Do It More (blacksmith.sh)
Stacked Diffs Can Be Expensive: Why You Should Do It More
Qodo automatically verifies PR complies with Jira ticket or GitHub issue (qodo.ai)
As development teams scale and projects become more complex, ensuring that code changes align with project requirements becomes increasingly challenging.
Show HN: Claude François – An AI Code Reviewer in the style of François Chollet (crossingminds.com)
eBPF Verifier Code Review – NCC Group [pdf] (nccgroup.com)
Show HN: LlamaPReview – AI GitHub PR reviewer that learns your codebase (github.com/marketplace)
LlamaPReview: 1-Click Install, Full Auto-run, Total Free!
GitHub Copilot code review in GitHub.com (public preview) (github.blog)
With Copilot code review in GitHub.com, you get fast, AI-powered feedback on your code, so you can start iterating while you wait for a human review.
What is the best AI/automated code review tool? (ycombinator.com)
CodeMind, CodeAnt, CodeRabbit, etc...<p>Separate the marketing from reality...what are you using, do you find it useful, and why?
GitHub's Legacy of Terrible Code Review (tylercipriani.com)
GitHub has always been a great code host. But GitHub’s code review system was an afterthought. Even now, Pull Requests still lag behind.
Some of us like "interdiff" code review (github.com)
I am currently in the process of evaluating Gerrit Code Review for work. Gerrit is an open source code review tool, as the name might imply, and works with Git repositories. What that means is that given some repository, you can:
Code review antipatterns (greenend.org.uk)
Show HN: Ellipsis – Automated PR reviews and bug fixes (ellipsis.dev)
Show HN: GPTLint – an OSS standard for LLM-based code review (github.com/gptlint)
Ask HN: What tool(s) do you use to code review and deploy SQL scripts? (ycombinator.com)