I think Go union type proposals should start with their objectives
(utoronto.ca)
At this point I've skimmed a number of relatively serious union type proposals for Go (which is to say, people who were serious enough to write something substantial in the Go issue tracker). One of the feelings I've wound up with as a result of this is that any such union type proposal should probably start out by describing what its objectives are, not what its proposed syntax is.
At this point I've skimmed a number of relatively serious union type proposals for Go (which is to say, people who were serious enough to write something substantial in the Go issue tracker). One of the feelings I've wound up with as a result of this is that any such union type proposal should probably start out by describing what its objectives are, not what its proposed syntax is.